I am +1 for using the default that maven suggest. Less to remember and document.
musachy On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com>: >> If no one responds, I will probably update the docs so that we take >> the default. But, if an artifact is already released, we should >> probably leave it as-is, since the released pom >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/tags/struts2-archetype-starter-2.1.8.1/pom.xml) >> has a link to the tag you created. > > I thing we/I should stick with the current tag naming convention as > the core project is following it. Right now we have only mess with > tags for archetypes ;-) > > > Regards > -- > Lukasz > http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
