2010/1/18 Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com>: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> (In the future the archetypes could be released together, it just puts >> an additional burden on the RM to deal with extra artifacts and the >> devs to test them in addition to the rest of the release. I would not >> hold these up waiting for a struts-with-xwork release.) >> > > I agree with Wendy on both points here, but I will add that this is > something that has a tendency to generate complaints. I, for one, am > guilty of pushing out a traditional release and then forgetting about > the archetypes.... I think this is part of why Lukasz is where he is > at right now (sorry, buddy!). IMO, the argument of the testing being > more difficult is somewhat debatable, because if the main artifacts > are releasable quality, then it should be right around the corner that > the active testers will then need to test the archetypes. > > So, to summarize, I say go with Wendy's suggestion to just start a new > vote with the sigs attached, then we'll discuss how we proceed (struts > 2.1.9 w/o xwork or struts 2.2.0 with xwork as our own artifact).
Ok, so THE VOTE IS CANCALLED! Regads -- Lukasz Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
