I've changed the subject to not to mess with the Vote. In my opinion removing Javassist as a dependency for OGNL was a mistake. It's the direct dependency and handling that on Struts 2 level generates more problems then it should. I'm planning to put back Javassist as OGNL dependency. And prepare dedicated example application for JBoss without Javassist.
Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl 2010/7/19 Johannes Geppert <jo...@web.de>: > > after upgrading a project i get an error "Javassist library is missing in > classpath! Please add missed dependency!" on tomcat. > > It is usefull to add this lib to the dependencys? > In the downloaded struts-2.2.1.zip it is not available. > > Best Regards > > Johannes Geppert > > > Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> >> The Struts 2.2.1 test build is now available. It's the same as 2.2.0 >> but dedicated application for JBoss was included and all old examples >> depend on Javassist library. Also new patch regarding FreeMarker >> caching was applied. >> >> Release notes: >> * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.1] >> >> Distribution: >> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.2.1/] >> >> Maven 2 staging repository: >> * >> [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-014//] >> >> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond >> with a vote on its quality: >> >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] General Availability (GA) >> >> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. >> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality >> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote >> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for >> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public >> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user >> list. >> >> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding >> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing >> to help do the work >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> > > > ----- > --- > web: http://www.jgeppert.com > twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.2.1-Vote-tp29193940p29207016.html > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
