Liferay as I know also have problem when implement 168 Too complex may be
/m/ -----Original Message----- From: Rene Gielen <gie...@it-neering.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:56:43 To: Struts Developers List<dev@struts.apache.org> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: portlet2 plugin Actual state: - JSR286 nature with automatic detection of the API version to use is implemented, but was not heavily tested till now. For test automation, we still lack a test container environment for 286 as we had for 168 (customized embedded Pluto) - Events are not supported, and there is a good amount of work to do. Nevertheless, even without event support the new plugin has major advantages when working in a 286 environment Given that Johannes gives us the input that things seem to be working in the real world (I think even production in his case), we should consider to move it into the main codebase. It should be by design a drop-in replacement for the current plugin and it is backwards compatible. I would say - let's go for it. - René On 27.01.11 08:37, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert <jo...@web.de>: >> is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox? >> I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing. > > What about the eventing, is it possible to improve that? > > > Regards -- René Gielen IT-Neering.net Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770 Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771 Cel: +49-(0)163-2844164 http://twitter.com/rgielen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
