+1 for package renaming -1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web stuff
On 7 June 2011 08:20, Lukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: > That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > 2011/6/5 Steven Benitez <steven.beni...@gmail.com>: >> Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it >> as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to >> merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure >> and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package. >> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale Newfield <d...@newfield.org> wrote: >> >>> I assume you meant "losing" instead of "using"? >>> -Dale >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web >>> > bits. I like that separation. >>> > >>> > Dave >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
