I think that Struts 3 deserves a deep analysis, we should enforce the concept that S3 is a new version based on S2, otherwise we will run the risk of mislead the struts users. Considering we are going to give a new style to the website, I think this is a good chance to take this aspect into consideration.
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara 2011/11/29 Łukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> > 2011/11/29 Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@googlemail.com>: > > While I'm pretty sure that the discussion about branding vs. versioning > > hasn't come to any conclusion yet, I strongly disagree with the proposed > > versioning of at least four numbers, as I understand this here. I'd > rather > > see it as > > > > 3.0.0 > > 3.0.1 > > 3.0.2 (Security problem detected) > > 3.0.2.1 (Fasttrack release) > > 3.0.3 > > ... > > 3.1.0 (Fabulous new features and all exciting stuff, but API stability) > > 3.1.1 > > ... > > > > The forth number is only for rare cases, usually each released version > > consists of three numbers. > > I'm also happy with that :-) > > What about brand naming ? Can we do it like this, we have project > version Struts 3.0.1 aka Struts 3 ? The name of packages is also > org.apache.struts3.* > > So mainly Struts 3 is a different beast than Struts 2 but base on the > same key concept. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
