Sorry, "compatability". JB On Mar 9, 2012 6:55 AM, "Jeffrey Black (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226049#comment-13226049] > > Jeffrey Black commented on WW-3636: > ----------------------------------- > > Lukasz, > > How can you tell it would break backward comparability? > > JB > > > > > > > > New "class" or "className" property for Action annotation. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: WW-3636 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3636 > > Project: Struts 2 > > Issue Type: New Feature > > Components: Plugin - Convention > > Environment: System any, Struts2 (2.2.3) + Convention Plugin > (2.2.3) + Spring Plugin (2.2.3) + Spring 3.0.5.REALESE > > Reporter: Tigran Babloyan > > Priority: Minor > > Fix For: 2.3.2 > > > > Attachments: Acction-Patch.txt, Action.java, > PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder-Patch.txt, > PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder.java > > > > > > It would be nice to have "class" or "className" property for Action > annotation as for now all ActionConfig's are created with real class name > value, which makes it hard to use plugin while using custom Object Factory > (for example Spring) as you are forced to name your bean with fully > qualified names (class name). > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA > administrators: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > >
