Even when i go for search about struts2 documents there are variety of resources available and that can make more confusion. Not sure about wiki, but honestly i like the documentation of Spring in place, if i want i can have HTML pages or option of PDF is also available there, more over there are not multiple versions of same set of documentation.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Christian, I agree on the "awful" documentation part. The S1 documentation > is better organized than S2. I thank everyone who wrote S2 documentation, > but it is incredibly difficult to sift through to find an answer. The wiki > may not be the right tool for the documentation although I don't have an > alternative except HTML files in SVN (like S1). If we can do anything to > make it more readable (even correcting the font and font size), I am all > for it. > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Comparison of web frameworks: > > > > > > > http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-curious-coders-java-web-frameworks-comparison-spring-mvc-grails-vaadin-gwt-wicket-play-struts-and-jsf/ > > > > Lot of the things this guy said on Struts isn't accurate. > > A few things are worth to think about it: > > > > Quote: > > > > "Many devs see Struts as a legacy technology, so don’t expect fancy code > > generation in the place of boilerplate code. You need to configure a lot > > to start prototyping. An example project can be a good starting point. > > Something on the bright side: Struts has a Convention plugin, that > > enforces some convention over configuration and provides annotations to > > configure URL mappings and some other stuff. This should speed up things > > a bit. > > > > Score: 2/5 – Lots of boilerplate code, no built-in code generation, no > > external powerful tools." > > > > This guy certainly did miss maven archetypes. Asides from that, we > > actually could think about some code generation tools. For example: > > > > $> struts-gen.sh de.grobmeier.app.LoginAction > > > > Generated LoginAction.java > > Generated login.jsp > > > > This paragraph also tells me we should stick with the idea of pushing > > the Convention plugin. > > > > Later the author wrote: > > > > "Awful official documentation. User-written tutorials are slightly > better." > > > > As already discussed today, I think this is not so wrong. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Paul > -- With Regards Umesh Awasthi http://www.travellingrants.com/
