Yeah, I'm not a fan of the Judge name either. Guard is better, but I'm not sure if it's best. What would the API look like?
On Thursday, October 10, 2013, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/10/10 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org <javascript:;>>: > > 2013/10/10 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org <javascript:;>>: > >> I like the idea except the Judge name. I think Authenticator is fine. > > > > Hm... basically what the interfaces do is to judge if e.g. action name > > is proper, parameter name matches given pattern, etc. It's some kind > > of authentication of request but rather in validation terms (I don't > > want to have another set of validators ;-)) Also users can have false > > fillings that Struts provides some built-in authentication mechanism > > (search phrase: struts authentication can point them to that logic). > > > > That's why SecurityJudge :-) > > Or SecurityGuard :-) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org <javascript:;> > >
