Hi Lukasz, The naming schema looks good too me. Except the 'branch-xxx' naming of a branch. Naming a branch branch-xxx looks useless too me.
But anyway we could start with a master, develop and feature-struts3 branches. Best Regards Johannes ################################################# web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2014/1/16 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> > Hi, > > As Struts migrated to Git it's time to plan what kind of git flow we > are going to use. > > I thought about something like that: > - 'master' contains always the latest released source (also as a tagged > version) > - 'develop' contains the next version and we can commit some small > patches directly to it > - 'branch-xxx' will contain large modifications and refactors > - 'feature-xxx' will contain huge modifications, like Struts3 > -- 'feature-xxx-yyy' will contain branch of feature branch > > The naming schema can be adjusted but I think it should be simple and > straightforward. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
