> > > >> On 29 May 2015, at 3:55 pm, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > >> My assumption was that we do this in Struts 3 - drop other layers and > >> use Log4j2 as a main layer. > >> > >> What do you think about that? > > > > As long as you’re making changes to logging, have you given > consideration to making SLF4J the standard facade in Struts? That > would allow making Log4j2 the preferred implementation without > impacting anyone who wanted to stick with Log4j “classic”. > > That's the idea behind using Log4j2 - it has the same capabilities as > SLF4J or even more - so we can drop existing XWork logging facade and > use directly Log4j2 as a facade but I have doubts if it isn't too > early :) > > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.0/log4j-1.2-api/index.html > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.0/log4j-slf4j-impl/index.html > >
Well, there are already some other changes that have impact on users, like moving plugins to archive or upgrading to JDK7. So IMHO it is ok to do the logging changes in 2.5. Regards, Christoph This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
