> <s:text name="<script>alert('ok')</script>" /> >In the latest build? Because is see something like this in source page >Test: <script>alert(\'ok\')<\/script>
OK, is escaped. <script>alert(\'ok\')<\/script> ## > script.test=<script type="text/javascript">alert("ok");</script> > <s:text name="script.test"/> script.test is in my .properties file, but as we are not escaping I would expect this to pop. My tests: <s:if test="#parameters.contains('error')"> <ul> <li> 1<s:text name="#parameters.get('error').value"/> </li> <li> 2 <s:text name="#parameters.error"/> </li> <li> 3 <s:property value="#parameters.error"/> </li> <li> <s:text name="getParameter('error')" /> </li> <li> 4 <s:property value="%{#parameters.get('error').value}"/> </li> <li> 5 <s:text name="<script>alert('ok')</script>" /> </li> <li> 6 <s:text name="script.test"/> </li> </ul> </s:if> - 1#parameters.get(\'error\').value - 2 #parameters.error - 3 <script type="text/javascript">alert("ok");</script> - getParameter(\'error\') - 4 - 5 <script>alert(\'ok\')<\/script> - 6 #6 is the only one now that pops which is correct. On 12 November 2016 at 08:24, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> wrote: > 2016-11-11 12:23 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber <gregh3...@gmail.com>: > >> <s:text name="<script>alert('ok')</script>" /> > > > > ....this pops! > > In the latest build? Because is see something like this in source page > > Test: <script>alert(\'ok\')<\/script> > > >> Maybe we should've thought about renaming this tag > > > > > > Think we are OK here as it does say what it does, maybe could add more > info > > in the hover if we are going to change it. Currently is says "Render a > > I18n text message" > > > > ## > > > > <s:text name="script.test"/> > > script.test=<script type="text/javascript">alert("ok");</script> > > I assume you meant that "script.test=<script > type="text/javascript">alert("ok");</script>" is passed a request > parameter? So again are using the latest build because I cannot > confirm this. > > > ..but do have html in the ApplicationResources.properties file so > sometimes > > I want it rendered as html eg <em>Important</em> but any > <script></script> > > could be a escaped when its loaded from the file initially? Its > difficult > > to say how far to take this! > > To be clear, this won't affect your messages from .properties files, > so if you are using html in there you will get that html on your page, > it won't be escaped. Right now, after disabling searching default > message in ValueStack, even escaping is not needed. > > > Think reducing the scope of <s:text> is worth doing, its easy to convert > to > > <s:property> and also reduces the duplication / maintenance also. > > Yes, but both these tags have different use cases, so I would leave > them just improve. > > > Regards > -- > Ćukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >