>-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> >Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 11:24 PM >To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> >Subject: Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking? > >On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:44 PM Yasser Zamani <yasserzam...@apache.org> >wrote: > >> Instead we may focus to facilitate "show mobile version of user web >> app". I don't know if S2 already have such facilities e.g. via Tiles >> or SiteMesh plugin. >> > >Desktop vs. Mobile is now solidly in the realm of CSS, possibly with >client-side JS >framework. S2 doesn't really try to solve those kinds of problems. > >If anything we could provide a responsive-first theming mechanism, but the >churn >in that space makes it... problematic. A Bootstrap or Foundation theme (or >both) >would be interesting, but it's a fair amount of maintenance work, and people >that >are using those frameworks have things pretty well in place already (in my >experience). Making it general-purpose enough would be tricky.
Thank you Dave. You were right that it's in the realm of CSS; and fortunately there is already a bootstrap and cloud plugin for Struts [1]. [1] https://github.com/struts-community-plugins > > >> I also currently have no vision on those front-end trends, am exploring. >> To be frank, something similar to Struts JQuery Plugin was my first >> theory, however, it may be absurd. >> > >Anything more complicated than jQuery will be API-driven and likely wouldn't >need any support on the S2 side. I could see maybe exposing endpoints or >whatever via a JS call, e.g., any of the several API documentation attempts, >but... >I don't know. > Yes I also think API Documentation could be added to plan (like websocket) because I already remember a user demand for Struts-Swagger plugin [2]. [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fd07fec16e9a5595e117008c6ec11df924ea2f339d8fade842aff82f@%3Cdev.struts.apache.org%3E > >> Thank you. I need to explore into uSvcs to reveal if S2 need to/can be >> used in such trends e.g. clouds. >> > >"Clouds" are just servers-not-on-site. It's too heavy for serverless (IMO, at >least >as it stands right now), and it can already be deployed on any reasonable >infrastructure. Fortunately I discovered there is already a cloud plugin for Struts [1]. Regards.