Julian Foad wrote: > "Tables"? I'm using "tables" terminology because I'm looking at BDB at > the moment because it seems better documented. I do intend to implement > on FSFS first, though, if I can translate what I learned. However, if it > is difficult to translate this from BDB to FSFS I will probably > implement first on BDB to get something going, as I think it's important > to have some working repositories to play with. (I thought I'd have that > by now but it's not as simple as ... OK, I never believed it would be > simple, but still.) >
You're going to have any amount of fun hacking FSFS to add forward references (or rather, generic modifiable node annotations). So I suggest doing this in BDB first, as proof of concept and to iron our any design bugs. -- Brane
