On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Mark Phippard wrote: >>> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>: >>>> Роман Донченко wrote: >>>>> C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan >>>>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300: >>>>>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python >>>>>> bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the >>>>>> bindings themselves to carry additional copyright and license >>>>>> baggage. If >>>>>> that's the case, I hereby request that we drop said baggage immediately. >>>>>> >>>>> Well, we can't drop it entirely, we should just move into a more >>>>> appropriate place (i.e. the tests/trac directory) and clarify which code >>>>> it applies to. >>>> Yes. It should be LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS_TEST_SUITE, not >>>> LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS (which should have exactly the same license as >>>> the rest of Subversion). >>> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely >>> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root? >> >> That's even better! > > Is there an example of this readily available. I'm pouring over > http://www.apache.org/legal/ and http://www.apache.org/licenses/ without > success here.
Yep. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
