On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:19 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > In my head, it wasn't a reversion -- it was a revision. I honestly thought > that you'd be okay with the change, having taken this statement:
I think if you place yourself in my shoes, I think perhaps you'd understand why I view it as a "reversion". I made the change, you said, "please revert", we start to discuss, and in the middle of the discussion, you just revert the change anyway. At the least, I think it would have been appropriate for you to suggest the change and then I could have said "Sure, that's fine - go ahead and commit." It wasn't like I wasn't trying to engage in a dialogue to see what would be better. Instead, I feel that you just did what you wanted to do and didn't really listen to me at all. Maybe I'm dead wrong, but that's certainly how I feel at the moment. -- justin
