Any WC-NG folks prepared to comment on this? We should put this description in note/wc-ng/... if it's OK.
- Julian On Tue, 2010-02-09, I (Julian Foad) wrote: > Hi, all. I've written up this brief definition of the WC-NG DB trees > at > <http://subversion.wandisco.com/wiki/index.php/WC-NG_trees_-_defining_BASE_and_WORKING_and_ACTUAL>. > Could you all have a look and add to it or just mention to me anything that > is worth noting or correcting. After a few rounds I'll move it to an in-tree > document. > > In particular, one question for Greg: [...] > > > So the wc_db trees are something like > > > > > > * (the pristine one, known as BASE) [...] > > > * (the tree-changes, known as WORKING) [...] > > > * (the on-disk and in-property-storage stuff, known as ACTUAL) > > > > > > A description of the text-content and properties of any nodes whose > > > text-content and/or properties are different from its WORKING version. > > > Any node that has no such differences does not appear in this tree. > > > > Its WORKING node; or if none, then the BASE node. > > Sorry Greg, I didn't understand your comment there. Could you clarify? > > > The ACTUAL tree can also record tree conflicts for nodes that exist in > > neither WORKING nor BASE.
