C. Michael Pilato wrote: > David Glasser wrote: >>> Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS, >>> of course.) >> Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it >> works :) > > I'll try to polish this up, add the FSFS flavor, and add a regression test > when I get some time. Thanks for the report and suggested fix.
Committed in r926151 and r926167. I don't feel particularly compelled to backport the changes as the higher-level FS stuffs *should* prevent this scenario from ever occurring anyway. Do you have an opinion one way or the other, David? -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
