> On Aug 27, 2010 11:33 AM, "Julian Foad" <julian.f...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > In single-DB world, the WC generated in merge_tests.py 16, a directory > > 'A/B/F/Q' has been deleted from disk without informing Subversion, so > > its status is 'missing'. > > > > Look at the difference between these two "svn status" runs on it: > > > > $ svn st A/B/F -vu > > ! 2 2 jrandom A/B/F/Q > > ! 2 2 jrandom A/B/F/foo > > 1 1 jrandom A/B/F > > Status against revision: 3 > > > > $ svn st A/B/F -v > > 1 1 jrandom A/B/F > > ! 2 2 jrandom A/B/F/Q > > ! 3 3 jrandom A/B/F/Q/R > > ! 3 3 jrandom A/B/F/Q/R/bar > > ! 3 3 jrandom A/B/F/Q/baz > > ! 2 2 jrandom A/B/F/foo > > > > In the old multi-DB WC world, status was not able to recurse into a > > missing directory because the metadata's unavailable, so it didn't, > > neither in local mode nor in '-u' mode. (In '-u' mode of course it > > could find out what children of 'Q' are in the repo, but it didn't.)
Oops: apparently in multi-DB mode it *did* recurse in -u mode, but not in local mode, and both parts of this behaviour is tested by stat_tests.py 20. In single-DB mode, currently it does the *opposite* ! > > Now, in single-DB, it can report the whole WC status. But should it? > > > > I don't know whether to make it stop there (for back compat?) or > > recurse. Either way, the current inconsistency is, I think, wrong. Greg Stein wrote: > Recurse. Show all the info. Can I make it do what it did before, at least for now? Stefan Küng wrote: > I would say if -u is given, it should recurse. If it's not set, then > there's no need to recurse because all subitems have the same missing > state as the deleted folder. If we schedule a dir for deletion, "status" shows all the contents of that dir separately, so I don't know that "all have the same state" is an argument. - Julian
