Lieven Govaerts wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:46:55 +0200: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > [ I'm only talking about the ra_serf tests in this email ] > > > > When I build the atomic-revprop branch against serf r1408, I see that: > > > > * diff_tests 24 29 (and many others [1]) fail with HEAD of the branch. > > (IIRC these two failures persist if I switch to serf > > ^/branches/0....@head.) > > * diff_tests 24 29 fail with r983269 reverted. (test output attached) > > In this log file, the only difference I see is that the output of > 'iota' and 'A' are in reverse order in expected versus actual output. >
How do you see "in a reverse order"? This is what I see: [[[ DIFF STDOUT (unordered): --- EXPECTED STDOUT +++ ACTUAL STDOUT @@ -1,17 +1,8 @@ -Index: A -=================================================================== ---- A (revision 2) -+++ A (revision 1) - -Property changes on: A -___________________________________________________________________ -Deleted: dirprop -## -1 +0,0 ## --r2value Index: iota =================================================================== --- iota (revision 2) +++ iota (revision 1) + Property changes on: iota ___________________________________________________________________ Deleted: fileprop ]]] which means that the entire diff for "A" has disappeared. > Isn't this just a question of ra_serf not guaranteeing depth-first output? > No. The above paste indicates that the expected output is already marked "unordered" and that the output for A's dirprop is missing. > Lieven > [..]
