On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Just one more thing: as I mentioned in my rather long mail, blame > would benefit the most from my optimization if the server were fast > enough. So if anyone could spare some review cycles (ok, I know they > are scarce these days), reviewing Stefan^2's integrate-cache-membuffer > branch would really help my cause as well ...
Yeah, just a question of tuits. If you've reviewed the branch, posting your conclusions here would be a great contribution. Speaking for myself, I feel you've got more experience in some areas of that branch than I do. :) (Apologies if you've already done so, and I've missed it.) -Hyrum