Ping. This has received no further comments.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
E: gav...@thespidernet.com
On 31/10/2010, at 12:42 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Is there a reason not to apply this "let's not reinvent the wheel" patch?
>
> [[[
> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1029231)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working copy)
> @@ -2205,15 +2205,14 @@ read_rep_offsets(representation_t **rep_p,
> return SVN_NO_ERROR;
> }
>
> -/* Combine the revision and offset of the ID to a string that will
> - * be used as a cache key. Allocations will be made from POOL.
> +/* Return a string that uniquely identifies the noderev with the
> + * given ID, for use as a cache key.
> */
> static const char *
> get_noderev_cache_key(const svn_fs_id_t *id, apr_pool_t *pool)
> {
> - return svn_fs_fs__combine_two_numbers(svn_fs_fs__id_rev(id),
> - svn_fs_fs__id_offset(id),
> - pool);
> + const svn_string_t *id_unparsed = svn_fs_fs__id_unparse(id, pool);
> + return id_unparsed->data;
> }
>
> /* Look up the NODEREV_P for ID in FS' node revsion cache. If noderev
> ]]]
>
> (It does not resolve my test failures.)
>
> Daniel
