Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > * The difference that's supposed to cause Philip's script to work as > advertised is that svn_repos_fs_change_rev_prop4() uses the same > propvalue to compute the ACTION parameter and to pass as the "old > propvalue" to the FS for atomicity. > > I'm too sleepy right now to determine whether Philip's script will > actually work as advertised given this server-side change, so just > throwing it out there for now.
The server side change hasn't been applied to the 1.6 branch AFAIK. That means that the ACTION parameter in the hook script is not reliable and so the script doesn't fix the problem. The obstacle to applying the server side fix to the 1.6 branch is that it changes the behaviour of server and so could be considered a regression, although that same behaviour change could also be considered an improvement. -- Philip
