(Haven't tested, but) Thanks!
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 19:01:50 +0100: > On 12.01.2011 18:43, Branko Čibej wrote: > > Doing that now, and I found the reason for that extra line -- it comes > > from the output of svnversion. Could be a difference between 1.6 and > > 1.7, I suppose. > > r1058257, local testing seems OK, but please double-check. > > -- Brane >
