On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I think we should strongly consider revving affected callbacks in the > 1.7 API and document restriction they have to heed. Then we can bring > the r1039808 code back. We can keep the code added in r1066541 for > backwards-compatibility if desired.
By the way, I think this decision is very important for progress of wc-ng. And I also think it has way too much impact to be decided on a lazy consensus basis. So I'm *not* going to move forward with this before I've heard at least a couple of affirmative opinions. Please consider taking the time to think about this issue and let your opinion be heard. Thanks.
