On Mar 28, 2011 8:23 AM, "Philip Martin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greg Stein <[email protected]> writes: > > > I recognize we need to grow the scope of transactions for speed purposes, > > but let's do it in a way based on semantics rather than implementation. For > > example: to speed checkout, we could have an API to add a complete directory > > of nodes, rather than an API to start/end a txn across those single > > additions. > > That doesn't seem to fit with our current editor. When we want to add a > directory we don't know the nodes. If we delay adding the directory > until the nodes are known we would have to store the entire checkout > somewhere else.
I'm well aware of the implications. I'm just trying to say: let's try to avoid poisoning our entire WC library with SQL transaction concepts, which should be restricted to just the internals of wc_db. Cheers, -g
