On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record >>> performance. I have something good enough to share: >> >> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...? >> >> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was >> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality. >> >> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code. >> >> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC >> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;) > > I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate > hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for > policy-making rather than coding. > > Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple > weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you > want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them > within the svn repository?
I checked them into a Git repository, both for ease of repository creation, and for ease of cloning. Of course, hosting SVN tools in Git may be seen as sacrilegious by some... ;) John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
