On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:01, Hyrum Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item
> skel. If you've got un-cleaned up working copies laying around, this
> may negatively impact them. :)
>
> (I went ahead with the commit, without a format bump, since work queue
> items are short lived, and we don't make any promises of upgrading
> them anyway.)
That is NOT the policy that we've chosen in the past.
Instead, we've extended a skel so that the code can determine which
version you're using (eg. a new, optional element at the end). Or
we've chosen two different OP names ("foo" and "foo-2") that dispatch
to different skel parsers and call a common function.
I disagree with changing the policy at this time, and would suggest
finding a solution that will not break working copies that have stale
work items in them.
Cheers,
-g
