On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:01, Hyrum Wright <hwri...@apache.org> wrote: > FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item > skel. If you've got un-cleaned up working copies laying around, this > may negatively impact them. :) > > (I went ahead with the commit, without a format bump, since work queue > items are short lived, and we don't make any promises of upgrading > them anyway.)
That is NOT the policy that we've chosen in the past. Instead, we've extended a skel so that the code can determine which version you're using (eg. a new, optional element at the end). Or we've chosen two different OP names ("foo" and "foo-2") that dispatch to different skel parsers and call a common function. I disagree with changing the policy at this time, and would suggest finding a solution that will not break working copies that have stale work items in them. Cheers, -g