On 06.05.2011 12:25, Philip Martin wrote: > Branko Čibej <br...@e-reka.si> writes: > >> On 06.05.2011 12:08, Philip Martin wrote: >>> "Roman Kellner" <muzu...@gmx.net> writes: >>> >>>> But what about the features I wish/request. Do they somehow exist, are >>>> they >>>> in the pipeline or do you consider them rubbish? >>> You didn't answer the question about why using '-r N' or '@N' in an >>> external does not do what you need. If your client doesn't respect the >>> revision in an external then your client has a bug. >> Yes he did answer that question. It's because, when you're inside the >> part of the WC that was created by the external, and you do an "svn up", >> the client doesn't see the external definition and updates to HEAD. Even >> the book says so. > How would his feature request fix that?
His feature request is basically to fix that, although I don't agree with the request itself. It'd be quite enough to just fix that behaviour, there's no new UI required, IMO. -- Brane
