On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 14:49, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: >> We can. >> >> HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion >> client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose >> a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon, >> which we no longer do). > Cool, so we don't have legal objections for making neon default library in svn 1.7.
-- Ivan Zhakov
