On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:48:07AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are
> questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for
> backport. What does that mean for trunk and 1.7? Here are the items
> I am thinking of (leaving out the items that were vetoed only because
> they were not considered appropriate for a fix release):
>
>
> * r878078, r878088, r878102, r878196
> Make KWallet window attached to terminal window.
> Justification:
> Without this change, KWallet window can appear behind terminal window
> and is left after killing terminal.
> Votes:
> +1: arfrever
> -0: peters
> -1: rhuijben ("/proc/%ld/stat" is ugly and Linux-specific -
> would just getenv("WINDOWID") work instead?)
> -1: stsp (I've removed the Linux-specific code from trunk in r1002144
> and r1002151, so trunk code only relies on getenv("WINDOWID").
> I would +1 a backport that also merges these revisions).
>
The above does not affect trunk since the bad code has been removed.
We never updated the backport nomintation to include the revisions
that removed the bad code from trunk.
