> -----Original Message----- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: vrijdag 3 juni 2011 19:11 > To: sbut...@apache.org > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: svn commit: r1131109 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py
> It is quite possible that they are both right. > > svn_wc_entry_t can't express everything that we can in the NODES layers. > Especially with multi layered replacements the status (which is based on the > top one or two layers) can be different than svn_wc_entry_t (which looks at > the lowest and the highest layer and notes tree replacements as > replacement on every node instead of only at the root: the way the old > revert base worked). > > There are a few more tests where the results differ. For that specific case > you can add entry_status and entry_rev arguments to the test suite. But I shouldn't forget: It is certainly not impossible that they are both wrong... I think we need an op_depth test for this case to verify all layers of the result. > Bert
