On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 15:30 -0400, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > Just a thought: is the upgrade time linear with WC size? If so, I say > > "good enough", if much worse than linear, probably not good enough. > > > > - Julian > > Hi Julian, > > To get a rough idea I ran upgrade on some bigger WCs this weekend: > > WC for | Files | Dirs | Size on Disk | Elapsed > Upgrade Time > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ^/subversion/tags/1.6.7[1] | 3,214 | 449 | 69.3 MB | 00:02:04 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ^/subversion/tags/ebcdic[2] | 14,703 | 1,826 | 313.0 MB | 00:11:44 > | x 4.57 | x4.07 | x 4.52 | x 5.65 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ^/subversion/branches[2] | 91,534 | 9,720 | 2.16 GB | 03:46:10 > | x28.47 | x21.64| x88.15 | x108.70 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So upgrade performance is roughly linear with WC size.
Fantastic! I was a little afraid it might not be. - Julian > Why upgrade is > so slow on my Windows box as compared to Philip's linux box are > another matter, one which I'll touch on elsewhere in this thread in a > few minutes. > > Paul > > [1] Using trunk@1133033 (results from earlier in this thread) > [2] Using trunk@1130808
