On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 15:59, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2011 7:30 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:25, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Just a heads up: the serf devs plan to bump serf from 0.7.x to 1.0.x >> > on the next release (imminent). That release will contain the error >> > string functionality discussed a month or so ago (for some work in >> > ra_serf), and other API changes that shouldn't impact Subversion >> > greatly. >> > >> > While I'm not comfortable with aspects of the serf API, and have >> > hesitated calling it 1.0, making the next release 0.8.x and keeping >> > that alive for Subversion's lifetime just doesn't make sense. Thus, we >> > will bump it to a true 1.0.x release and maintain that for the >> > lifetime of its primary consumer (svn 1.7.x). >> >> Just a stupid question: is it makes sense to make serf separate >> library? Is there any users of serf library others than Subversion? >> May be we can include serf library to Subversion as part of internals >> of libsvn_ra_serf? We can always release as separate library when API >> will stabilized and etc. > > Serf is used by others already; not just Subversion. mod_pagespeed and > Apache httpd to name two. There may be more that I/we haven't been made > aware of... > Ok, I didn't know about these usages.
-- Ivan Zhakov
