C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 16:54:46 -0400: > On 07/07/2011 04:50 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Hmm. For wc we have upgrade tests using tarred old working copies. > > Perhaps we should do the same for svnadmin/fsfs? > > > > % grep upgrade svnadmin_tests.py | wc -l > > 0 > > We haven't tested upgrades of filesystems in the past because we thus far > haven't allowed 'svnadmin upgrade' to do anything substantial. Typically, > it just plops a new integer into the 'format' file. There was some minor
We don't test 'svnadmin pack' either. > file reorg in the FSFS side a while ago, but again, nothing really major. > And that's intentional: we want upgrade to be a constant-time operation, Then why does 'svnadmin upgrade' say % $svnadmin upgrade r3 Repository lock acquired. Please wait; upgrading the repository may take some time... ? > leaving more costly upgrades to the likes of a parallel dump/load. > > -- > C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand >
