On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 07/13/2011 04:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> All, >> >> Our first prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and >> signing: 1.7.0-beta1. The magic revision is r1146221 (but a known bug >> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file). >> You can find the tarballs here: >> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-beta1/ > > I've wrapped up testing of the beta1 tarball. All the tests pass for me > except the Perl bindings tests. They seem to build fine (albeit with the > typical slew of warnings). They seem to install fine. But the tests fail > immediately: > > [...] > # Error: Can't load > '/home/cmpilato/tmp/subversion-1.7.0-beta1/subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/blib/arch/auto/SVN/_Repos/_Repos.so' > for module SVN::_Repos: > /home/cmpilato/tmp/subversion-1.7.0-beta1/subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/blib/arch/auto/SVN/_Repos/_Repos.so: > undefined symbol: svn_swig_pl_thunk_history_func at > /usr/lib/perl/5.10/DynaLoader.pm line 193. > # at > /home/cmpilato/tmp/subversion-1.7.0-beta1/subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/blib/lib/SVN/Base.pm > line 59 > [...] > > I can see this at the shell myself, too: > > $ perl > use SVN::Repos; > Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1/auto/SVN/_Repos/_Repos.so' for module > SVN::_Repos: /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1/auto/SVN/_Repos/_Repos.so: undefined > symbol: svn_swig_pl_thunk_history_func at /usr/lib/perl/5.10/DynaLoader.pm > line 193. > at /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1/SVN/Base.pm line 59 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1/SVN/Repos.pm > line 5. > Compilation failed in require at - line 1. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at - line 1. > $ > > I notice that when I run 'ldd' on the bits installed into > /usr/local/lib/perl, they seem to be linking against the libraries in my > build directory, not the install locations.
Mike, Is this relatived to the problem that Philip and Peter have discussed elsewhere in this thread? If so, it's sounds like a longstanding one that isn't a regression from 1.6 or prior 1.7.0 prereleases. We're only 1 *nix sig short of a bushel. :) -Hyrum