On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, <pbu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: pburba
> Date: Tue Aug  2 16:25:06 2011
> New Revision: 1153181
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1153181&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Cast some votes.
>
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1153181&r1=1153180&r2=1153181&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Tue Aug  2 16:25:06 2011
> @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ Candidate changes:
>      +0: danielsh (we shouldn't depend on libsvn_client fixes to avoid
>                    accumulating tempfiles on the server)
>
> - * r1151055
> + * r1148043, r1151055
>    Allow building with serf trunk on windows.
>    Votes:
> -     +0: danielsh
> +     +0: danielsh (r1151055 only)
> +     +1: pburba
>
>  * r1152189, r1152190
>    Fix an assertion on copying nodes that are not presence normal.
> @@ -150,16 +151,7 @@ Candidate changes:
>    Justification:
>      Can be too slow to be useable.
>    Votes:
> -     +1: philip
> -
> - * r1153138, r1153141
> -   Don't CHECKOUT added directories when using a HTTPv1 server.
> -   Justification:
> -     Getting a HTTP 500 error while committing new directories is not
> nice.
> -   Notes:
> -     r1153141 removes an accidentally added SVN_DBG() from r1153138.
> -   Votes:
> -     +1: rhuijben
>

Did you intend to remove the proposed backport from the file?


> +     +1: philip, pburba
>
>  Veto-blocked changes:
>  =====================
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to