On 08/04/2011 04:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Finally, note that our intent is to switch to requesting content by
> <path, SHA1> tuples in the future. Those will be *very* cacheable (the
> SHA1 acts as the created-rev). So even if ra_serf didn't have the
> happy accident of using the server-provided URL, we would be returning
> to a cacheable form in 1.8.

Strictly speaking, in order to adhere to our current authz subsystem APIs
(which require both an svn_fs_root_t and a path), we'd need to use <path,
revision, SHA1>.  mod_authz_svn doesn't take the root into consideration,
but that's only one implementation of authz for Subversion. :-(

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to