Hi Hyrum,

My initial thought is;
"To favour results over process" is the wrong move.
Processes are sometimes in place to save us from ourselves.

Gavin.


On 10/08/2011, at 10:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:

> So, the only thing holding up this release is the lack of a Windows
> sig.  While I don't like that situation, at this point I think it's
> foolishness to allow process to get in the way of progress in the
> release, so I'm tempted to move forward with the signatures we have.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Hyrum
> 
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No takers?  With only the slightest of effort, you too could be one of
>> the signers of 1.7.0-beta3, and have your name immortalized in the
>> release announcement.  Don't delay, test on your Windows box and sign
>> today!
>> 
>> -Hyrum
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> FYI: We're still lacking one Windows sig for release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks to all those who have tested and signed thus far.
>>> 
>>> -Hyrum
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
>>>> signing: 1.7.0-beta3.  The magic revision is r1154051 (but a known bug
>>>> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file).
>>>> You can find the tarballs here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-beta3/
>>>> 
>>>> This is still a beta release, but is expected to be the last one.
>>>> Stability continues to improve, but as you may expect, these
>>>> prereleases are intended for intrepid users and testers only.  We're
>>>> cutting this now, to allow folks to test and sign over the weekend, if
>>>> they'd like.  To release, we need a complete set of 3 *nix and 3
>>>> Windows signatures.
>>>> 
>>>> Please send sigs here:
>>>> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Hyrum
>>>> 
>>>> PS - The revision-number-in-header file issue is expected to be fixed
>>>> for the release candidates.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>>>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com/

Reply via email to