On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:24, Hyrum K Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >... > Does this also mean that we shouldn't call Python_Finalize(). I'd > hate to shutdown the Python system when it's still being used by > another thread in our process...
I honestly don't recall, and would need to look into the Python source to figure it out. I do believe that the Initialize call is idempotent. So there shouldn't be a problem just calling that, and use process-exit as your Finalize. Definitely leave a ### marker for further research. Note that I would recommend that mod_dav_svn would hold $something which then holds the interpreter state. Then for each call into fs_py, you merely need to worry about thread state. Alternatively, you could use svn_atomic_once() and stash an interpreter into a global variable. I suspect a handle for mod_dav_svn would imply an API change (not necessarily a bad thing to have a create/destroy pair; our IRC discussion about an svnd may need a similar process-level initialization in the "frontend"). >... Cheers, -g
