On Sun, 2011-08-21, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Julian! > > Great stuff! :D > > Well, I haven't looked at the patch in great detail, but the summary reads > like honey and cream. Ever since I waded through the diff code years ago > this task has been on my, er, long-term to-do list... Thanks! :) > > Oh but it's not done yet, of course. The "Later we can drive...", does that > mean you'll continue to work on it in the coming weeks? Or are you off to > other tasks and it's going to be *a lot* later if it depended on you?
I've got a working patch for enabling WC-WC diff summaries, so I'll finish that very soon, and I'll probably do WC-repos as well, since I don't think that can be much more work. - Julian > On 08/20/2011 03:56 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Author: julianfoad > > Date: Sat Aug 20 13:56:52 2011 > > New Revision: 1159880 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1159880&view=rev > > Log: > > Change the implementation of 'svn diff --summarize' to use the standard > > 'diff callbacks' mechanism, so that it may be more easily extended. The > > summary mode currently supports only repos-repos diffs, and it was reporting > > the summary results directly from a delta editor drive. Instead, write a > > set of diff callbacks that produce summary information, and drive them via > > the existing svn_client__get_diff_editor() for a repos-repos diff. Later we > > can drive the same diff callbacks from WC-WC and WC-repos diff sources. > ...

