Neels J Hofmeyr wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 21:34:30 +0100: > It was suggested to extend the svn:externals syntax, adding a flag > that marks externals that should behave differently. By now this > seems to me to be the best way out. What would that look like? > > [-rN] [-c] <URL>@P <PATH> > > -c = include in a recursive commit > (positions of -r and -c exchangeable) > > Does that sound like a good plan?
How does 1.7.0 behave when it runs into an externals property with such a value?
