On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 01/17/2012 04:31 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> I'm working at experimenting with a simple Ev2 consumer implementation >> (see the ev2-export branch). In doing so, I've once again noticed >> that anybody implementing such a consumer has to implement every >> receiver. We don't provide default implementations, nor a way to only >> specify certain callbacks we're interested in. This is getting a bit >> tedious. >> >> Is this part of the design, or simply an oversight? Is there any >> drawback to providing default no-op implementations of the various >> receivers? > > You mean, the way we have default implementations of all the old editor > functions that are overridden only as necessary? One could argue that no-op > default receiver implementations are deceptive to drivers of the interface. > But then, the Ev2 driver can't legitimately expect any particular behavior > from the Ev2 implementation itself, so... *shrug*. I say "+1 on no-op > default receiver functions".
Sounds good: r1232910. -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
