Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes:

> What happens when you set MAX_NR_CONNS (that's not the right symbol, but
> close) in linsvn_ra_serf/update.c to 2 ? That should eliminate the
> parallelism. If that succeeds, then maybe we can patch 1.7.x in some way to
> allow svnrdump to set that max, yet keep multiple for regular
> checkout/update/sync.

Still fails with:

-#define MAX_NR_OF_CONNS 4
+#define MAX_NR_OF_CONNS 2

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com

Reply via email to