Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > danie...@tigris.org wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 17:00:07 -0800: >> ------- Additional comments from danie...@tigris.org Thu Feb 16 17:00:07 >> -0800 2012 ------- >> % ln -s foo bar >> % $svn add -q bar >> % $svn cat bar >> svn: E200009: '/home/daniel/src/svn/t1/bar' has no base revision until it is >> committed >> zsh: exit 1 $SVN cat bar >> >> By comparison, >> % $svn cat ../site/publish/faq.en.html >> link faq.html<no newline> >> % >> >> ------- Additional comments from danie...@tigris.org Thu Feb 16 17:12:43 >> -0800 2012 ------- >> It applies to any file, not just to symlinks. > > Sanity check please -- we do expect 'touch foo; svn add foo; svn cat > foo' to work, right?
1.7 is much like 1.6: svn: E200009: '/home/pm/sw/subversion/obj/wc/f' has no base revision until it is committed svn: Can't open file 'wc/.svn/text-base/f.svn-base': No such file or directory Note that 'svn ls' has the same behaviour. I suppose we could make them work. Perhaps it should involve a new symbolic revision 'WORKING@? $ svn cat file@WORKING $ svn ls dir -rWORKING How many other commands would be affected? -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
