On 02/23/2012 10:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:48:12 -0500: >> As Mark indicated, I was *not* thinking about a different capability per >> release -- just a single, changing one. My suggested syntax was to be >> "client-version=1.7.3", establishing precedent for the use of the equal sign > > What client-version would dev builds report?
First guess: SVN_VER_NUMBER. If we feel we need higher granularity, we can go with a full-fledged SVN_VERSION, but that *might* force us away from using the existing capabilities mechanism. (I don't know what restrictions it has regarding the use of whitespace.) -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
