On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs > which should also be signed by those who test them. > I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.
I made a slight mistake by putting APR 1.4.6 into the -deps tarball while the 1.6.x test suite isn't prepared to deal with the APR hash ordering changes. Should we re-roll the deps tarball with APR 1.4.5? I'd call this a packaging bug and re-use the existing version number. Nobody but myself has signed the -deps tarball yet. In any case, we'll need to flag the incompatibility with APR 1.4.6 as a known test-suite bug.
