On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:09:01PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > Why ever would we want to rely in any way on a hash table iterator's order? > What!? You misunderstood what I wrote. I'm not suggesting we do so.
I was just assuming that the APR-1.4.5 resulted in lexically sorted output (and apparently I was wrong about this, see Dustin's reply). > We want a stable ordering. That generally means "sort" rather "hash table > implementation details". Yes, we agreed on that weeks ago.
