On Jun 21, 2012 8:23 PM, "Greg Stein" <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 2012 7:22 PM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > > > > On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > > Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly > > > requested non-existent properties. > > > > Ignore this. It fails tests in an odd way. > > ps_props and ret_props are 4-level hashes. I'm not sure that the copy loop does the correct merging. > > Look at the set_ver_prop function to get an idea of the overall structure.
And also: sorry. I forgot this aspect when we were chatting about overlays. I didn't mean to misdirect like that :-( I have thought about moving the code to more traditional prop hashes, and did some of that work a few months ago, but it has a ways to go. Cheers, -g
