On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:30:42AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 06/25/2012 11:24 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > >>> It also still fails when there are unversioned targets, which pre-Berlin > >>> gracefully "Skip"ped. :-( > >> > >> r1353587. I think this gets us back to where we were. > > > > I'm not sure if it really brings us back where we were. > > Sorry. I was referring merely to the where-we-were-ness of, "Can Mike > perform his daily all-projects update with seeing an error." Yeah, kinda > self-centered, but what can I say? > > (I've taken taken the first glance at how --accept behavior is different now.)
Bert, I think your concerns are valid, but can you please file them as issues with 1.8.0 milestone or start a new discussion thread for each? I know you've had more concerns than just this one and while I appreciate you making us aware of them it would be better if we kept them in separate first-class discussion threads or issues so they don't get lost. Thanks.
